The Myth Of Sustainable Leather

This was originally published on Bead & Reel

One of the main attempts I hear at justifying the continued use of leather in this modern, socially conscious day and age is that it’s “natural” and therefore not as bad vegan leathers, which are usually made from various plastics, including Polyurethane (or PU).
This has been a hotly debated topic in sustainable fashion, and while animal leather has many known issues when it comes to polluting our environment and bodies, the majority of sustainable fashion advocates have held strongly to their stance that vegetable tanned leather is still the lesser of two leather evils. 
Those of us who choose vegan fashion for ethical reasons have found these arguments challenging to counter, with decisions on both sides being based on very little facts and lots of emotions, coming down to a divided conclusion about whether or not we should be killing and eating and wearing animals. It’s been an entirely moral issue… until recently.
 

Hidden amongst the over 134 page 2017 Pulse of the Fashion Industry report by the Copenhagen Fashion Summit was a very interesting graph, giving a new perspective on vegan fashion and vegan leathers: 

 
 
Pulse of the Fashion Industry Copenhagen Fashion Summit Vegan Fashion
 
 
Animal fibers take three of the top four spots in cradle to gate environmental impact, with cow leather at the very top, 11 spots above even polyester.
This is the first time I’ve seen research like this. Suddenly the discussion is no longer contained to simply the ethics of using animals in fashion, but it is now shifted to the ethics of using animals in fashion, at the detriment to our environment. 
 
As a vegan and the owner of a vegan company, I have always recommended skipping leather, silk, wool, bone, and other animal products and fibers. But now you don’t just have to take my word for it – on page 80 the report goes on to recommend:
 

Synthetic leather has only a third of the environmental impact of cow leather… As Kering says in its 2015 EP&L statement, different leathers can have an over tenfold difference in environmental impact based on their type and origin, how the animal was raised, and how the tanning process took place. Switching to alternative materials can directly improve a product’s footprint.

 

 
Environmental Impact of Materials

 

Fortunately, it’s never been easier to switch to alternative vegan materials such as PU synthetic leatherPiñatex (made from pineapple fibers), and cork, to name a few. If you haven’t already, now is the perfect time to make the switch to a vegan closet. It’s kinder to animals, and now we know it’s also kinder to our environment. 

 

Header photo via Pixabay

 

Share this article

Sica Schmitz

Sica Schmitz is the founder and curator of Bead & Reel, the online ethical boutique for eco-friendly, cruelty-free, sweatshop-free fashion, and the winner of the 2017 Sustainable Business Council’s Sustainable Business Award. With a background in costume design and sustainable styling, she is active in fair trade and vegan fashion both locally and globally as a Fair Trade LA board member, the Fashion Editor of Vilda Magazine, and the founder and host of the annual Fair Trade Fashion Show Fundraiser in Los Angeles.

A frequent speaker and writer, she has been featured in dozens of publications including Bustle, Origin Magazine, The Good Trade, and Vegan Life Magazine.

No Comments Yet

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

WHO WE ARE

Vilda (Swedish for “the wild one”) is an international digital vegan fashion magazine. Our aim is to inspire elevated compassionate living. For info and media kit: sascha@vildamagazine.com

COPYRIGHT © VILDA MAGAZINE

Sign Up for Vilda News